My gut feel is that is too heavy -- too much structure where is isn't neased, unless that is just local to the pod


BTW -- do try and clip the bottoms off the messages, thanks



--- On Thu, 3/22/12, KarlS <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:


From: KarlS <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>
Subject: [Carbondragonbuildersandpilots] Re: CDII 3-part wing
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 6:44 PM



Yes agreed. I have introduced confusion again. Looking at the side view of the center section you would have the airfoil. The front of the box beam would be on the spar line. The rear of the box beam on the aft spar which would be much shorter in length making it not rectangular but poly.. shaped.

Constant dimensions when viewed from the top for the entire center section.

Karl

--- In This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Kenny Andersen wrote:
>
> I think the spar has to be mostly on a plane
>
> --- On Thu, 3/22/12, KarlS <kschneider@...> wrote:
>
> From: KarlS <kschneider@...>
> Subject: [Carbondragonbuildersandpilots] Re: CDII 3-part wing
> To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
> Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 6:32 PM